Kampala, Uganda’s capital, is home to a vibrant street economy that is vital for many families. However, this vibrant economy is constantly in tension with the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), which views street vending as illegal and disruptive to urban planning.
For many vendors, this is not just a business, it’s survival, it’s hard work, but at least to put food on the table. Vendors face constant threats from the KCCA, who regularly conduct raids to clear them from the streets.
The KCCA, responsible for urban space regulation, frequently conducts raids on vendors, causing them to lose their livelihoods and collect money from them as a bribe to get there goods back.
The tension between vendors and the KCCA is a complex issue. The authority argues that street vending obstructs traffic, poses safety risks, and undermines efforts to maintain order in the city.
On the other hand, vendors argue that the formal market spaces suggested by the KCCA are expensive and overcrowded, making them unviable for small traders.
Hon. Hajjat Minsa Kabanda Minister for Kampala Capital City and Metropolitan Affairs, acknowledges the challenges but defends the authority’s position. “We are not against people earning a living. However, street vending creates chaos and endangers lives. We’re working to create designated vending zones to address this issue fairly,” She explains. Yet, for many vendors, these promises feel distant and unattainable.
Vendors in Kampala, Uganda, face risks such as raids, loss of goods, and long hours in harsh conditions.
Community groups support vendors and they are advocating for policies that balance urban management with informal workers’ rights.
The story of vending on Kampala’s streets reflects broader socio economic challenges, including unemployment and urbanization.
Street vendors in Kampala demonstrate resilience in a rapidly urbanizing city, highlighting the struggle for survival.
While the Kampala Capital City Authority balances regulation and workers’ rights crucial for sustainable growth. The city must adopt inclusive policies for infrastructure and people.
The question remains, can the city adopt inclusive policies that protect both its infrastructure and its people, ensuring that vendors can work with dignity and peace?
